Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdahl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!nsc!amdahl!gam From: gam@amdahl.UUCP (G A Moffett) Newsgroups: net.cycle Subject: Re: Helmets are not what I thought they were Message-ID: <2423@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Mon, 23-Dec-85 04:29:46 EST Article-I.D.: amdahl.2423 Posted: Mon Dec 23 04:29:46 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 25-Dec-85 02:35:39 EST References: <2392@amdahl.UUCP> <853@rlgvax.UUCP> Reply-To: gam@amdahl.UUCP (G A Moffett) Organization: Blue Mouse Trailer Resort, Hellmouth, CA Lines: 38 Summary: additional facts about the helmet In article <853@rlgvax.UUCP> beaver@rlgvax.UUCP (Sonar Warrior) writes: >You are not giving us all the facts. True, but there is only so much I know. The purpose of my article was a commentary on helmets, not a codified description of what happened to one of them. A summary of the accident will come later, but let me answer your questions regarding the helmet. > Did your helmet strike a non-movable object[?] I don't know details such as this. It could only have struck the car, and the dirt on the ground. > Was the face >shield made for your helmet? Yes. > What brand was it (helmet), was it approved by >DOT? or SNELL? or even SHCA? It was a Bell Professional, DOT and Snell `80 approved. It was about 1.5 years old, and had not been previously damaged. (It is retired from use now, of course). > Did you have your chin strap properly >secured and did your helmet fit correctly? Yes... > But if you got as bad >a head injury as I think you did, I'm surprised that you knew you drove >your bike that day! ... true (I hardly remember riding that day!), and I answer the previous question based on past history. -- Gordon A. Moffett ...!{ihnp4,cbosgd,hplabs}!amdahl!gam