Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!duke!jma
From: jma@duke.UUCP (Jon M. Allingham)
Newsgroups: net.emacs
Subject: Re: Montgomery vrs Gosling EMACS
Message-ID: <6720@duke.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Dec-85 22:36:30 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.6720
Posted: Mon Dec 16 22:36:30 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Dec-85 05:15:15 EST
References: <556@scirtp.UUCP> <585@brl-sem.ARPA> <204@hoqam.UUCP>
Reply-To: jma@duke.UUCP (Jon M. Allingham)
Distribution: net
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 12
Summary: 


> ...
>What are the differences between Gosling and Montgomery EMACS?
>What is so superior about Gosling's EMACS?
>Tom.
>

Montgomery EMACS is a LOT faster than GNU Emacs and I hear it is
a faster than Gosling's EMACS. It is somewhat simpler (ie better in
my opinion) then GNU EMACS.

Jon Allingham, AT&T Bell Laboratories - OYOC at Duke University