Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!seismo!rochester!ray
From: ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank)
Newsgroups: net.games.chess
Subject: Re: Chess ratings and shoelaces
Message-ID: <13880@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Dec-85 11:26:26 EST
Article-I.D.: rocheste.13880
Posted: Wed Dec 11 11:26:26 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Dec-85 00:36:53 EST
References: <373@ubvax.UUCP> <13581@rochester.UUCP> <2587@sunybcs.UUCP> <13731@rochester.UUCP> <1076@oddjob.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 17

> In article <13731@rochester.UUCP> ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank) writes:
> >By the way my very informed friend, you forget to mention the category of
> >Life Master.  What is it you ask?  I'm not 10000000% sure of the details, so
> >look it up and post it.
> 
> "Life Master" is a bridge rating, not a chess rating, you idiot.
> _____________________________________________________
> Matt		University	crawford@anl-mcs.arpa
> Crawford	of Chicago	ihnp4!oddjob!matt

Poor Matt, he's lived in the windy city too long, seems his brain has been blown
away.  

Matt, the term life master is certainly a bonifide chess category.  If it is 
also used in bridge (real men don't play bridge) then fine.

ray