Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uok.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!okstate.UUCP!uok.UUCP!whherron
From: whherron@uok.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Question on resurrection
Message-ID: <2200040@uok.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 8-Dec-85 19:09:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uok.2200040
Posted: Sun Dec  8 19:09:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Dec-85 04:26:43 EST
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #N:uok.UUCP:2200040:000:644
Nf-From: uok.UUCP!whherron    Dec  8 18:09:00 1985


This came up in a game over the weekend:

 During a campaign, one of our characters was killed.  A
resurrection spell was cast, and worked...but the character
had forgotten all of the spells that he had memorized prior
to tthe campaign.

We argued that since the character could remember all of the 
events of today (up to his death), then he should also remember
his spells.  The DM argued that a) this was a traumatic injury,
and b) that spells are saved in a "different" kind of memory
(emphasis is DM's).

Is there any precedent for his decision (preferably in print
somewhere)?  Should there be?

Bill

(ihnp4!cuuxb!uokvax!"whherron%uok")