Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucla-cs.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ucla-cs!rick From: rick@ucla-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.games.trivia Subject: Re: Different trivia games Message-ID: <8118@ucla-cs.ARPA> Date: Thu, 19-Dec-85 17:05:53 EST Article-I.D.: ucla-cs.8118 Posted: Thu Dec 19 17:05:53 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Dec-85 06:31:30 EST References: <527@micomvax.UUCP> <8112@ucla-cs.ARPA> Reply-To: rick@ucla-cs.UUCP (Richard Gillespie) Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Lines: 24 Keywords: Dictionary game In article <8112@ucla-cs.ARPA> das@ucla-cs.UUCP (David Smallberg) writes: > ... >Oxford Trivia is just "The Dictionary Game", a game-party classic. Someone >picks a word from a dictionary that they think no one else would know (one that >they probably don't know either). Everyone writes down a made-up definition. >The person who picked the word mixes them up and reads all the definitions >(including the real one) in random order. Everyone says which definition they >think is the real one. If you made up a definition, you get one point for >each person who chooses it; those who guess the correct definition also get a >point. (The person who picked the word gets no points.) Everyone takes a turn >being the one to pick a word. We called this game Fictionary when we played it. We also would give some arbitrary number of points to the person picking the word from the dictionary if NO ONE picked the correct definition. This leads people to search for words with rather bizarre definitions. If we were feeling particularly silly we would also have a score for laughs for the people who like to write funny definitions (eg. pash - a legal call in the new game craze Cerebral Inebrial Bridge). -- Rick Gillespie ARPANET: rick@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU UUCP: ...!{cepu|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|ucbvax}!ucla-cs!rick FISHNET: ...!flounder%tetra!rick@ichthys