Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!d3unix!jhs@mitre-bedford.ARPA
From: jhs@mitre-bedford.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: Re: QST
Message-ID: <453@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 9-Dec-85 18:33:09 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.453
Posted: Mon Dec  9 18:33:09 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Dec-85 10:09:37 EST
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 11

I too am a subscriber to QST.  I often wonder, however, why they have to
charge us an additional fee for QEX (which I don't get) when the content
of QST (aside from paid ads) is so skimpy.  I would prefer to see the
content of QEX thrown in free in QST, making it a MUCH more interesting
publication, more comparable to Ham Radio or 73.  As it is, there is
very little in each issue that (in my opinion) is worth keeping.

If I had a choice I would take QEX instead of QST.  Maybe they could
offer that as a membership option.

						-de W3IKG