Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site inuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!inuxd!rcf
From: rcf@inuxd.UUCP (R Fitch)
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: RE:QEX
Message-ID: <825@inuxd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Dec-85 08:26:11 EST
Article-I.D.: inuxd.825
Posted: Tue Dec 17 08:26:11 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Dec-85 03:11:08 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Consumer Products, Indianapolis
Lines: 11

I am also dissappointed in QEX and the few articles that are published
could easily fit in QST and make it a better magazine. The real problem
is probably that very few people submit articles to QEX and no-one
is to blame but those of us that have some good technical background
and don't take time to share it with others (myself included). Maybe
the ARRL needs to assign volunteers to look into different areas of
design and theory and publish more articles in the QEX??? Don't
know the cure but I am ready to let my subscription drop but first
I have to evaluate why I haven't submitted anything.
				73 and Holiday Wishes
					de KN9K