Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttrdc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mgnetp!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
Newsgroups: net.med,net.info-terms
Subject: Re: VDT's and eyes.
Message-ID: <665@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Dec-85 05:02:07 EST
Article-I.D.: ttrdc.665
Posted: Fri Dec 20 05:02:07 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Dec-85 00:27:10 EST
References: <341@weitek.UUCP> <642@ttrdc.UUCP> <755@brl-tgr.ARPA> <488@ucdavis.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL
Lines: 20
Xref: watmath net.med:3018 net.info-terms:764

In article <488@ucdavis.UUCP>, ccrdave@ucdavis.UUCP (Lord Kahless @ Imperial Propoganda) writes:
>
>Anybody else notice that a lot of the cheap green monitors just KILL your
>eyes when you're working under fluorescent lights?
>
>Also, what's the best vt100 type terminal for someone with very bad eyes?

Even good green monitors bother some people.  Personally I like white the
best followed by amber, but some people can't stand staring at white, either.

Let me put in a plug here for the AT&T 5420 and 5425 terminals.  They come in
both green and amber (sorry, no red ones yet :-).  The resolution is quite
good.  They support a superset of vt100 functions.
-- 
 -------------------------------    Disclaimer:  The views contained herein are
|       dan levy | yvel nad      |  my own and are not at all those of my em-
|         an engihacker @        |  ployer or the administrator of any computer
| at&t computer systems division |  upon which I may hack.
|        skokie, illinois        |
 --------------------------------   Path: ..!ihnp4!ttrdc!levy