Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site codas.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!hjuxa!petsd!peora!codas!mikel
From: mikel@codas.UUCP (Mikel Manitius)
Newsgroups: net.jobs
Subject: Re: Headhunters on the net
Message-ID: <408@codas.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Dec-85 12:45:37 EST
Article-I.D.: codas.408
Posted: Mon Dec 30 12:45:37 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 31-Dec-85 03:46:28 EST
References: <395@codas.ATT.UUCP> <519@sdchema.sdchema.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems (SDSS) - Orlando
Lines: 23

> In article <395@codas.ATT.UUCP> mikel@codas.ATT.UUCP (Mikel Manitius) writes:
> >I beleive that the net is a ``not for profit'' network. Therefore,
> >it is against the "rules" for someone like a headhunter to post
> >advertisements which they would use directly for their own profit....
> >
> >The following rule should be considered:
> >
> >	A person may not post a job add in the network if they are
> >	going to make a dirrect profit for finding someone through it.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand this. Do you consider hi-tek companies to
> be "not for profit" organizations? And why is "direct" profit such
> a dirty word/deed/consequence (as compared to "indirect" profit? )
> 
> 				Sameer Nadkarni

I mean that there are many companies that pay phone bills to receive and
send usenet. They do not use it to advertise their products, or services.
Why should a headhunter be allowed to advertise his services on a network
for which other people would be paying for?
-- 
			Mikel Manitius @ AT&T-IS Altamonte Springs, FL
			...{ihnp4|akgua|bellcore|clyde|koura}!codas!mikel