Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: 16 v. 32 bit
Message-ID: <1010@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 23-Dec-85 18:45:25 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1010
Posted: Mon Dec 23 18:45:25 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Dec-85 04:04:01 EST
References: <1006@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 6

>  This  leads
> to an interesting question: should 68000 C compilers have  sizeof(int)
> == 16 bits or 32 bits?

Either is correct.  Could we please stop arguing the relative
merits of microprocessors on the C language newsgroup?  Thanks.