Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ima.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ima!johnl
From: johnl@ima.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Right shift vs. divide
Message-ID: <124000005@ima.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 1-Jan-86 23:01:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ima.124000005
Posted: Wed Jan  1 23:01:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jan-86 05:31:54 EST
References: <974@brl-tgr.UUCP>
Lines: 11
Nf-ID: #R:brl-tgr:-97400:ima:124000005:000:507
Nf-From: ima!johnl    Jan  1 23:01:00 1986



Now that we know that right shifting is not the same as division, has 
anybody ever come up with a plausible reason for computers to have 
arithmetic shift instructions on twos complement machines (other than that 
they're easy to implement and poorly educated engineers might have thought 
they were the same as division)?  For positive numbers, they give the same 
result as unsigned shifts, and for negative numbers they give the wrong 
answer.  Followups to net.arch, please.  

John Levine, ima!johnl