Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mmintl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory,net.legal Subject: Litigation Message-ID: <955@mmintl.UUCP> Date: Fri, 27-Dec-85 07:31:28 EST Article-I.D.: mmintl.955 Posted: Fri Dec 27 07:31:28 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Dec-85 20:10:34 EST References: <365@umich.UUCP> <28200417@inmet.UUCP> Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) Followup-To: net.politics.theory Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT Lines: 29 Xref: linus net.politics.theory:1730 net.legal:2391 In article <28200417@inmet.UUCP> janw@inmet.UUCP writes: >I must be missing something but why wouldn't the standard default >libertarian solution for most things, namely litigation or the >possibility of it - work for pollution ? This is a complete change subject (so I changed the subject line). This quote got me to wondering -- is there any connection between the libertarian fondness for litigation, and the current mushrooming of litigation in the United States? The most obvious connection would be that libertarian thought has made people more likely to sue. I doubt this; the ideas don't seem to be that widespread, and the people doing the suing don't seem to be the libertarians. Alternatively, the libertarian ideas might have been encouraged by the increased respectability of taking someone to court. The time scales don't seem to me to be right for this; libertarianism emerged first. (Although maybe not before the trend started.) Perhaps it's just a coincidence. I would be interested if anyone has any ideas on the subject, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------- I have directed followups to net.politics.theory, since I think this discussion mostly belongs there, not net.legal. Frank Adams ihpn4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka Multimate International 52 Oakland Ave North E. Hartford, CT 06108