Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site uvacs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!ncsu!uvacs!dsr From: dsr@uvacs.UUCP (Dana S. Richards) Newsgroups: net.puzzle,net.math Subject: Re: Re: Logic puzzle creation query Message-ID: <63@uvacs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 13-Dec-85 13:43:26 EST Article-I.D.: uvacs.63 Posted: Fri Dec 13 13:43:26 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 15-Dec-85 00:22:44 EST References: <4253@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <435@hounx.UUCP> <214@yale.ARPA> Organization: U.Va. CS dept. Charlottesville, VA Lines: 30 Xref: watmath net.puzzle:1249 net.math:2631 > > Has Smullyan actually done anything significant? Meaning no disrespect, > but I think of Smullyan as clever version of Martin Gardner? Any support of > the claim that he is one of the "6 greatest living mathematicians?" Greatest > in what sense? He's a clever communicator,and a bright problem solver, but > as a mathematician, what has he contributed to the field? Anyone out there > with details? > I do not have them here but he has written two excellent texts/monographs on logic and I have found numerous journal articles by him but I do not yet have a comprehensive list. I am not a logician but I understand his contributions were considerable. I attended a lecture of his where the "light" portion was a (very) short proof of incomputability. Despite what another poster said I do believe that he is a mathematician; he is also a philosopher (with a strong bias, see Tao and 5000) which is natural for a logician I suppose. He mainly does puzzles and expositions now as far as I can see. Gardner is not clever? I see what you mean in that he (like Conway) interjects humor where ever possible. He is quite unlike Gardner in that he started out as a mathematician and drifted into exposition. Hence his books are really tough sledding for anyone without a math background. (Smullyan's interest in puzzles is longstanding; I believe he started doing retrograde chess problems in the 50's and was an early correspondent of Gardner in the early 60's.) I have all of his books in paperback, and am quite annoyed that Lady has not yet appeared in paperback. Hopefully Mockingbird will be in pb soon.