Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert
From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: net.med,net.women
Subject: Re: Coke isn't it (for contraception)
Message-ID: <1696@hammer.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Dec-85 00:27:58 EST
Article-I.D.: hammer.1696
Posted: Mon Dec  9 00:27:58 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Dec-85 20:00:58 EST
References: <2110@aecom.UUCP>
Reply-To: tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy
Distribution: na
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 16
Summary: 

In article <2110@aecom.UUCP> werner@aecom.UUCP (Craig Werner) writes:
>
>	Based on the anecdotal accounts of the use of a coca-cola douche as
> a form of contraception in the third world,   [ ... ]
> Their result was that Classic Coke was 5 times more effective at
> killing sperm in-vivo than its new emasculated formula, suggested
> not pH but rather some factor in the "secret formula" was responsible.
>	The conclusion of the study was, at least in this area, "'Classic' 
> Coke Is It."

Yes, but is it any good against AIDS?    [maybe Coke and rum?  :-) ]

(why not?  It kills sperm, it kills the pancreas...)

Snoopy
tektronix!tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy