Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ism780c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.arch
Subject: Re: Re: What if IBM Had chosen the 68000? Not what you think Re: 386 Family Products
Message-ID: <136@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Dec-85 20:32:40 EST
Article-I.D.: ism780c.136
Posted: Wed Dec 11 20:32:40 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Dec-85 06:48:20 EST
References: <129@intelca.UUCP> <392@aum.UUCP> <225@l5.uucp> <533@scirtp.UUCP> <617@edison.UUCP> <318@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.micro:13078 net.arch:2295

In article <318@well.UUCP> farren@well.UUCP (Mike Farren) writes:
>In article <617@edison.UUCP>, jso@edison.UUCP (John Owens) writes:
>> 
>> (In addition to the PC, UNIX runs on other machines without memory
>>  management, including some bare (no MMU) 68000 machines.)
>> 
>   Yep. UniSoft had a version which ran on the Lisa (Macintosh XL), and I
>know of no MMU in there.
>  

The interview with the Macintosh designers in the February 1984 BYTE
implies that the Lisa has an MMU.
-- 
Tim Smith       sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim