Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site othervax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!micomvax!othervax!ray
From: ray@othervax.UUCP (Raymond D. Dunn)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: 386 Family Products
Message-ID: <743@othervax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Dec-85 10:09:58 EST
Article-I.D.: othervax.743
Posted: Mon Dec 16 10:09:58 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Dec-85 05:55:54 EST
References: <129@intelca> <4400130@uiucdcsb> <6185@utzoo.UUCP> <6228@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: ray@othervax.UUCP (Raymond D. Dunn)
Organization: Philips Information Systems - St. Laurent  P.Q., Canada
Lines: 9
Keywords: 8080, 64k

In article <6228@utzoo.UUCP> henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes:
>> ..[comparing 8086 to 68000]...
>
>Why shouldn't we compare them?  Intel advertising does it all the time.
>In grossly misleading ways, too.

Lets practice what we preach Henry!

Ray Dunn.  ..philabs!micomvax!othervax!ray