Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ism780c.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: Your software rights are in danger Message-ID: <201@ism780c.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Dec-85 15:48:55 EST Article-I.D.: ism780c.201 Posted: Thu Dec 26 15:48:55 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Dec-85 13:00:34 EST References: <826@brl-tgr.ARPA> Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA Lines: 35 In article <826@brl-tgr.ARPA> sienkiew@louie.udel.edu writes: > >If you don't buy software that has license agreements like that, you probably >won't be buying much at all. Imagine what it would be like if you bought a >new car and the manufacturer didn't even have to guarentee that it could move >under it's own power! > Why would you buy such a car? Don't all the proposed lawa require the agreement to be clearly visable and labeled? If you see a product with an agreement you are not willing to follow, then don't buy it! >Now suppose that this was a shrink-wrap license under the Illinois law. And >suppose you bought the software by mail-order. You cannot determine if it >works without accepting the license agreement. Even without a license agreement, a store is not required to take back purchased items ( I think ). For example, if I buy a book, read it, and then decide that it was a lousy book, it didn't live up to my expectations, and I will never, ever, want to re-read it, I can't take it back to the bookstore and get my money back! Isn't it now the same with software? Sure, many dealers let you return something if you are not satisfied, but I think that they are doing this to try to get you to buy from them, not because any law says they must. At least under the Illinois law, they are required to take back a product if you see that the shrink-wrap license is not suitable. So you are gaining, not losing. What I really don't understand is why people object to being required to honor voluntary agreements. You are not forced to buy a product with a license agreement you do not like. You are allowed to return it if you buy it by mistake. What's the beef? -- Tim Smith sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim