Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gatech!seismo!rochester!dibble
From: dibble@rochester.UUCP (Peter C. Dibble)
Newsgroups: net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: What's a good OS-9 box?
Message-ID: <13924@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Dec-85 08:42:25 EST
Article-I.D.: rocheste.13924
Posted: Thu Dec 12 08:42:25 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Dec-85 04:01:19 EST
References: <3566@utah-cs.UUCP> <967@lsuc.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 20

> In article <3566@utah-cs.UUCP> brownc@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric C. Brown) writes:
> >I'd like to get an OS-9 box, either OS-9 or OS-9/68k.  What is a good box
> >with an 80 char screen, 2 floppies & hard disk interface, and 2 serial ports?
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >
> >Eric C. Brown
> >brownc@utah-cs
> >..!ihnp4!utah-cs!brownc
> ... 
>      Finally, if you are into porting yourself, well, I've always felt
> that a VME-10 would make a fairly good OS-9 machine.
> James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
> ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura

There is a version of OS-9 for the VME-10.  I got one by mistake a while
ago.  I think it is an expensive computer, but I agree that it has potential
as an OS-9 machine.

Peter Dibble