Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site minster.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!mcvax!ukc!reading!minster!nigel
From: nigel@minster.UUCP (nigel)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: CSA 68020 board
Message-ID: <640@minster.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Dec-85 05:46:09 EST
Article-I.D.: minster.640
Posted: Thu Dec 19 05:46:09 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Dec-85 00:46:19 EST
References: <755@caip.RUTGERS.EDU>
Reply-To: nigel@minster.UUCP (nigel)
Organization: University of York, England
Lines: 22
Xpath: reading onion.cs

In article <755@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> louie@trantor.UMD.EDU writes:
>From: Louis A. Mamakos <louie@trantor.UMD.EDU>
>
>It just so happens that I was in San Diego last week, and I dropped by to
>visit the CSA folks.  In case you tuned in late, they are a 68000 systems
>house that manufacture a general purpose 68020/68881 piggyback board that
>plugs into a 68000 socket.  In addition, they have a version for the Amiga
>that also has 256K of static RAM on board.  The current version (a prototype)
>that I played with runs at the same clock speed as the 68000 on the Amiga.
>
>
>                      Standard Amiga     68020/cache     68020/cache/fast mem
>
>32 bit/no reg             458               515               781
>
>32 bit/reg                458               515               657   (??)
>
>16 bit/reg                549               588               781
                                                               ^^^

68020,cache,fast memory, and still slower than an Atari 520ST??
Is it worth it?