Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ism780c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim
From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: CSA 68020 board
Message-ID: <179@ism780c.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Dec-85 15:36:53 EST
Article-I.D.: ism780c.179
Posted: Fri Dec 20 15:36:53 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Dec-85 01:06:38 EST
References: <755@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> <271@mips.UUCP>
Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith)
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 14

>>[discussion of Amiga Dhrystone results, with and without 68020]

In article <271@mips.UUCP> kim@mips.UUCP (Kim DeVaughn) writes:
>Looks like you were using the native Lattice C compiler, as your Standard
...
>Seems very apparent that one thing that's sorely needed for the Amiga is a
>*good* (read "well-optimized") compiler;  it would seem that 850 is alot
>closer to the true capability of the Amiga, as that is in the same ballpark

Even a non-optimized compiler should get much better Dhrystones than Lattice
is!  Has anyone looked at the code to see just what it is doing?

-- 
Tim Smith       sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim