Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc13.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc13!ec150fcy
From: ec150fcy@sdcc13.UUCP (Joseph McCaughey{|stu)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Developers kits
Message-ID: <400@sdcc13.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Dec-85 02:21:17 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc13.400
Posted: Sun Dec 22 02:21:17 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Dec-85 00:37:28 EST
References: <722@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> <92@uscvax.UUCP>
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 26

> We have just received our 2 developer amigas, shipped from Oakland, CA, but 
> NO software and NO documentation came with it. And we are among the "official"
> Amiga developers!  All 3 packages that form the "Developer's Kit" are listed 
> as not shipped under B/O (Back Order?).  Somebody at C-A said the kits with 
> the NEW documentation were supposed to be ready!  It seems that this is not 
> the case.  Anybody at C-A can comment on this?  It is funny (and frustrating),
> we have TWO machines and cannot do anything with it. Not even test whether 
> they work.
> 
> Marco Papa
> USC - Computer Science Dept.
> 
> UUCP:	...!{decvax,ucbvax,hplabs}!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!uscvax!papa
> 	...!{allegra,trwrb,trwspp,ism780,cithep,oberon}!uscvax!papa
> CSNET:	papa@usc-cse.csnet
> ARPA:	papa%usc-cse@csnet-relay.arpa

A friend of mine is a registered developer.

I told him about it and he said that you should try showing your
developers acceptance to the dealers and asking them for copies of 
the necessary disks (also he said that you should show them your
shipping receipt as proof that you are lacking the software).


Larry Joe MacCaughey