Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-milo.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!ut-sally!seismo!harvard!gcc-milo!zrm
From: zrm@gcc-milo.ARPA (Zigurd R. Mednieks)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: ST wins over Amiga (??!)
Message-ID: <414@gcc-milo.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 23-Dec-85 10:19:04 EST
Article-I.D.: gcc-milo.414
Posted: Mon Dec 23 10:19:04 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Dec-85 03:29:14 EST
References: <617@ihlpm.UUCP> <2511@dragon.fluke.UUCP> <412@aum.UUCP>
Reply-To: zrm@gcc-milo.UUCP (Zigurd R. Mednieks)
Distribution: net
Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.micro.amiga:1272 net.micro.atari:2096


I have not yet seen any discussion of the relative merits of Amiga and ST
software here. This is suprising, considering that software is one department
where the ST takes a good drubbing from the Amiga. The ST's O.S. is derived,
I think, from CPM68k. I never heard a nice word about that O.S. The Amiga's
O.S. is derived from Tripos (sp?), which is a very nice, clean multi-tasking
system.

Let's see some flamage here!

-Zigurd