Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ius2.cs.cmu.edu
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!ius2.cs.cmu.edu!ralphw
From: ralphw@ius2.cs.cmu.edu (Ralph Hyre)
Newsgroups: net.micro.apple
Subject: Re: New megabyte Apple card?
Message-ID: <256@ius2.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 8-Dec-85 22:50:58 EST
Article-I.D.: ius2.256
Posted: Sun Dec  8 22:50:58 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Dec-85 03:04:31 EST
References: <317@uwai.UUCP> <2a905ed0.4237@apollo.uucp>
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 21

In article <2a905ed0.4237@apollo.uucp> faubel@apollo.uucp (Ken Faubel) writes:
...
>   Has anybody else heard about a 68K product or a //x machine.

All I've heard about the next Apple // is that the case will be the same color
as the //c.   A 68020 coprocessor card would be nice, but it won't mean much
unless they provide a sensible bitmap graphics mode with it.

Maybe an Apple // with a 680x0 processor, Unidisks & Hard disk, a sensible
bitmap and a few Meg of memory will be another of the 'future Macs' Apple's
talking about.  That would be a machine work buying, since I could run 
Apple //, Mac, and probably even Unix applications on it...

(And with z-80/HD64180 and 8088/80286/80386 coprocessor cards, I could even
run CP/M and MS-DOS applications.  Talk about disk format nightmares!)

					- Ralph