Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ISM780C.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ISM780C!tim From: tim@ISM780C.UUCP (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari Subject: Re: Jersey Amiga Users Group Message-ID: <122@ISM780C.UUCP> Date: Mon, 9-Dec-85 16:29:33 EST Article-I.D.: ISM780C.122 Posted: Mon Dec 9 16:29:33 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Dec-85 22:04:24 EST References: <325@well.UUCP> <121@ISM780C.UUCP> <329@well.UUCP> Reply-To: tim@ISM780C.UUCP (Tim Smith) Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA Lines: 61 Xref: linus net.micro.amiga:4930 net.micro.atari:1868 Distribution: In article <329@well.UUCP> perry@well.UUCP (Perry S. Kivolowitz) writes: >In article <121@ISM780C.UUCP>, tim@ISM780C.UUCP (Tim Smith) writes: >> [Line where I use a naughty word] >> >> Why is most of net.micro.amiga cross posted to net.micro.atari? And why is >> most of the ST stuff cross posted to net.micro.amiga? Maybe the groups >> need to be re-organized: >> > Usually when one has a beef with a particular article posted >to the net, one sends a meesage to the author and not to the net as >a whole. Since you have sent your message to the net, this reply >should also be as public. You are correct. A beef with a particular article should be handled by mail. What I should have done was mail your a short complaint about your article, and posted an article under a new title about the cross postings. Sorry about directing a general flame at a particular article. > > Do you have a problem expressing yourself with the aid of >profanity? Or perhaps your command of the language is so limited that I express myself with profanity quite well :-) > > I sent my posting to net.micro.amiga rather than nj.general >because I don't believe I'd reach enough New Jersey, Pennsylvania, >and New Yorkers that way. It sounds like it istime for someone to make a 'ne' distribution for New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, etc. Could someone over in that area create such a distribution? Or merge all those little states into one proper state :-) > >I sent my note to net.micro.atari because, as I mentioned, the INTER- >ESTED PUBLIC is welcome. I thought that atari fans would appreciate a >chance to gain more information about other computers. > Can Mac owners come too? Why not post to net.micro.mac then? How about IBM PC owners? Why not cross post to net.micro.pc? Most users groups I have heard of allow anyone to come. Is the NJAUG different? What would happen to the net if everyone with a users group posted announcements of meetings to every other net.micro.* group? >Now, Timmy lad, what really do you a have problem with? Are you mad >because by saying ``interested public'' you, being a proto-simian >blob, were left out? > Are you saying that proto-simian blobs are not part of the general public? I am going to have to call the ACLU or the ALF to deal with you! :-) ps: ignore the mail I just sent you about this. I have been having mailer problems, so it probably won't get to you. Even if it does, it really doesn't say anything not said in this article. -- Tim Smith sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim ^ ^-- Not ISM780C, ignore the header!