Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbjade.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucbjade!mwm From: mwm@ucbopal.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (I'll be mellow when I'm dead) Meyer) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari Subject: Re: ST wins over Amiga Message-ID: <204@ucbjade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Fri, 13-Dec-85 21:19:30 EST Article-I.D.: ucbjade.204 Posted: Fri Dec 13 21:19:30 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Dec-85 23:54:18 EST References: <617@ihlpm.UUCP> Sender: network@ucbjade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@ucbopal.UUCP (Mike (I'll be mellow when I'm dead) Meyer) Distribution: net Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 28 Xref: watmath net.micro.amiga:1110 net.micro.atari:1967 In article <617@ihlpm.UUCP> rtb@ihlpm.UUCP (Todd) writes: > After reading a lot of articles about this years Comdex it is >becoming more obvious that Atari has already won in the ST vs. >Amiga wars. technically So Atari follows in IBM's footsteps, and succeeds with a technically inferior product :-). Seriously, I don't own either machine. I'm probably going to be buying one in the near future (january), and haven't decided which. However, I want a machine for twiddling LISP, which means (to me - I want to load the editor and MasterScope and the online help and ...) lotsa-memory. Say, 4 Meg or so. Atari doesn't seem to want to market a machine to do that. The Amiga is open, and there are 2Meg boards on the market. Of course, the plaintiff cries from people trying to twiddle the mouse from C doesn't help the ST any. And I'm going to ignore the prospects of Commodore going under. I'll pick the machine that best does what I want, then support the company that makes it. Final thought: I'd be suprised if the ST doesn't outsell the Amiga, by 2:1 or better. After all, I expect most people to look at them, see windows and two price tags (one roughly 1/2 the other), and buy the smaller price tag.