Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site unmc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!unm-la!unmvax!unmc!ma3752af From: ma3752af@unmc.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari Subject: Re: ST enthusiasts Message-ID: <565@unmc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 14-Dec-85 15:17:15 EST Article-I.D.: unmc.565 Posted: Sat Dec 14 15:17:15 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 18-Dec-85 02:46:14 EST References: <342@unmg.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: University Of New Mexico Computing Center, Albuquerque, NM Lines: 27 Xref: watmath net.micro.amiga:1155 net.micro.atari:1993 > Ok all you 520st enthusiasts, its time to stop dreaming. The atari > st is an incredible low end home computer. But it is NOT an Amiga. > Sure, with some very difficult assembly language code (counting cycles! > egad!) - you can copy the bouncing ball, but if anyone seriously thinks > a ST can match up to the Amiga, they are crazy. > > I don't own either machine, and probably never will, however I have > researched both. Both have merits of their own, but they are two > completely different machines. The Amiga is a better computer, flat > out, and it also costs twice as much. Which is better for the money? > I don't know, but I am tired of hearing atari salesmen, and atari > owners, blabbing that the ST is "the same thing as an Amiga". That > quote came directly from an atari salesman. > > I am not about to list features, but if this letter makes you red, grab > the specs for both machines and see for yourself. No comparison. Oh, come off it!! Your message before this totally destroys your credibility. You sell Amigas - therefore you are biased in its favor. The ST is a great machine for the price; the Amiga is a great machine, but I can't afford 1795 to get one. Come down off your high horse and go use an ST - it is a great machine, with a great price!!! V.J. Murphy B.K. Thaeler