Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-atari
From: MRC%PANDA@SUMEX-AIM.ARPA (Mark Crispin)
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari
Subject: Amiga vs. ST
Message-ID: <12167890272.7.MRC@PANDA>
Date: Tue, 17-Dec-85 14:37:34 EST
Article-I.D.: PANDA.12167890272.7.MRC
Posted: Tue Dec 17 14:37:34 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Dec-85 04:45:46 EST
Sender: dillon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 11

Did anybody notice how, in the 8 bit days, all the Atari nuts said "Yes,
the Apple II is a faster machine, but the Atari is better because it has
better sound and graphics"?  Today, all the Atari nuts are saying, "Yes,
the Amiga has better sound and graphics, but the Atari is better because
it is a faster machine"!

Frankly, I want a fast machine with superior sound and graphics.  The ST
isn't fast enough, and the Amiga's graphics/sound aren't good enough.

'nuff said about toy computers.
-------