Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!info-atari
From: Felton.PA@XEROX.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: Amiga vs. ST
Message-ID: <851218-112050-1429@Xerox>
Date: Wed, 18-Dec-85 14:20:48 EST
Article-I.D.: Xerox.851218-112050-1429
Posted: Wed Dec 18 14:20:48 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Dec-85 05:40:19 EST
References: <12167890272.7.MRC@PANDA>
Sender: mayo@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12



	I have owned an Atari 800 four 4 years and I have never heard anyone
say that the Apple II was faster than the Atari. (True, disk access is
faster). If you think the new ST and Amiga are toys then you are in the
minority. Both computers are more powerful and elegant than the IBM PC.
I guess the computer elitists will look down their noises at any
computer which is priced to be affordable by the average consumer. As
for me, I welcome the rest of the world into the computer age.
	
	
John