Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekigm2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!tekigm2!wrd From: wrd@tekigm2.UUCP (Bill Dippert) Newsgroups: net.micro.atari,net.news.group Subject: Re: Results of split atari group poll Message-ID: <323@tekigm2.UUCP> Date: Sat, 21-Dec-85 18:23:38 EST Article-I.D.: tekigm2.323 Posted: Sat Dec 21 18:23:38 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 23-Dec-85 04:18:13 EST References: <231@pluto.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 36 Xref: watmath net.micro.atari:2070 net.news.group:4879 > I was going to post these results last week but our phone lines > were down. I received 15 responses (I think I pulled a few in from > postings but I'm not sure. I know I didn't get everyone who posted > (but didn't mail)) There were 10 Yes and 5 No. > > Nearly everyone had ideas for what the groups should be called. Here they are > old machines st > net.micro.atari net.micro.st (2 votes) > net.micro.atari.eightbit net.micro.atari.st > net.micro.atari.520st > net.micro.atarist > net.micro.atari net.micro.atari.st (2 votes, one with a no vote) > net.micro.atari.8bit net.micro.atari.st > > There was one vote that we split, but that the group for old machines NOT be > called net.micro.atari800 > > Most of the no votes said there was not enough traffic and the eight bit > group would go away. One suggested that everyone use keywords to describe > which machines their message is about. > > I head from: > > I have no idea what to do now. I was hoping for more votes. I'm going > to talk to some net people about this and see what they say. Meanwhile, > if you want your votes to be counted and it's not in here, send it > posthaste. > -- Please count me as voting for a split. Net.micro.atari and Net.micro.st Or whatever is fair! But let's get on with it. Bill Dippert tektronix!tekigm2!wrd