Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ecsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!ecsvax!hes
From: hes@ecsvax.UUCP (Henry Schaffer)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: ST wins over Amiga (??!)
Message-ID: <998@ecsvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 31-Dec-85 11:51:49 EST
Article-I.D.: ecsvax.998
Posted: Tue Dec 31 11:51:49 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 1-Jan-86 04:46:43 EST
References: <617@ihlpm.UUCP> <2511@dragon.fluke.UUCP> <1958@islenet.UUCP> <4301@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <309@3comvax.UUCP> <1254@vax135.UUCP>
Organization: NC State Univ.
Lines: 7
Xref: linus net.micro.amiga:5232 net.micro.atari:2083

> This is the second posting that I have seen that implies that the Amiga uses a
> 68020 (32-bit) CPU. I thought it used a 68000 (16-bit). Am I wrong?
> 	Dave Horn, AT&T Bell Labs.
   It's just people discussing what a wonderful machine this would be *IF*
it had a 68020 and 8+Mb of RAM, and especially how much better this would be
than today's ST.  1/2 :-)
--henry schaffer