Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site unirot.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!ut-sally!im4u!caip!unirot!grr
From: grr@unirot.UUCP (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: Commodore and ST debate
Message-ID: <272@unirot.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-Jan-86 15:13:12 EST
Article-I.D.: unirot.272
Posted: Fri Jan  3 15:13:12 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 5-Jan-86 01:12:53 EST
References: <447@ssc-bee.UUCP> <1874@uwmacc.UUCP>
Reply-To: grr@unirot.UUCP (George Robbins)
Distribution: net
Organization: The Soup Kitchen, Piscataway NJ
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.micro.amiga:1402 net.micro.atari:2169

In article <1874@uwmacc.UUCP> oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster) writes:
>In article <447@ssc-bee.UUCP> ditzel@ssc-bee.UUCP (Charles L Ditzel) writes:
>
>   The first opinion above (>>) is probably due to the fact that Atari is not
>using the resources (i.e. $$$) of the thousands of universities on USENET to
>provide product support, whereas the folks at Commodore are.  Must be because
>Atari just doesn't care about it's customers, eh?


Vicious - nasty - argh.

Please note that Amiga is providing their primary online discussion on the
COMMERCIAL networks - BIX, Delphi, Compuserve and their own developers
bulletin board.

Would you rather that they didn't read this group and respond to questions?

-- 
George Robbins			uucp:	...!ihnp4!tapa!grr
P.O. Box 177				...!caip!unirot!grr
Lincoln U, PA  19352	[Any ideas herein are not responsible for themselves!]