Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site l5.uucp Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!amd!amdcad!lll-crg!l5!gnu From: gnu@l5.uucp (John Gilmore) Newsgroups: net.invest,net.micro.pc Subject: Re: Home banking via UNIX (and market sense!) Message-ID: <339@l5.uucp> Date: Sun, 15-Dec-85 06:45:21 EST Article-I.D.: l5.339 Posted: Sun Dec 15 06:45:21 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 17-Dec-85 03:57:55 EST References: <163@pyuxv.UUCP>, <331@houxs.UUCP> <165@pyuxv.UUCP> Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco Lines: 28 Xref: watmath net.invest:949 net.micro.pc:6231 In article <165@pyuxv.UUCP>, craig@pyuxv.UUCP writes: > >> What a shock. I was under the impression that AT&T played some > >>historical role in the development of modems. > > > >I don't know that recognition of anyone's historical role was an important > >motivation in the development of Spectrum. > > > >The 4000 did not exist when the Spectrum software was developed. Furthermore > >it is not Hayes compatible. > > What is so precious about Hayes compatibility... > Who elected them the 'IBM' of modems in the world at large! I know it's rough for you AT&T guys to realize that you don't set the standards any more, but "the market" (not the one this newsgroup is for -- no flames please) elected Hayes. They put out a good product that ran rings around the AT&T modems (dialer? that takes a separate box, with a separate interface, and odd software support.) While they might not have invented dial-over-the-RS232-link, they recognized it as a great idea, which AT&T is only now doing (in response). Flames by mail please, *no further followups to net.invest*. I'm at ihnp4!l5!gnu. It does sound odd that these banks would make something you can't call up from a dumb terminal. Maybe they think it will keep the hackers out. It certainly keeps me out, though I don't see much use in paying $5/mo when postage is only 22c.