Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site l5.uucp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!l5!laura
From: laura@l5.uucp (Laura Creighton)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: Re. Turning the other Cheek
Message-ID: <357@l5.uucp>
Date: Tue, 24-Dec-85 00:55:35 EST
Article-I.D.: l5.357
Posted: Tue Dec 24 00:55:35 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Dec-85 03:33:12 EST
References: <1650@decwrl.UUCP> <10900011@ada-uts.UUCP>
Reply-To: laura@l5.UUCP (Laura Creighton)
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 16

>Could you be more specific?  What moral issues?  It seems that making
>policy based on morality is something society should avoid.  I personally
>would not accept courts imposing sentences and justifying them with
>"Because it's the `moral' thing to do".  I get very upset when someone
>tries to impose ANY moral standards on me.
>

Now, *I* don't understand.  Do you want any courts at all?  If you do,
don't you want them to uphold the laws?  And don't you want your laws
to be moral?  Not liking somebody else's morals -- this I can understand.
But not having *any* morals at all? My mind boggles -- I can't understand
it at all.
-- 
Laura Creighton		
sun!l5!laura		(that is ell-five, not fifteen)
l5!laura@lll-crg.arpa