Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sigma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision!uw-beaver!tikal!sigma!bill
From: bill@sigma.UUCP (Bill Swan)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Distribution woes
Message-ID: <564@sigma.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Dec-85 10:21:37 EST
Article-I.D.: sigma.564
Posted: Fri Dec 13 10:21:37 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Dec-85 00:37:38 EST
References: <4265@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Reply-To: bill@sigma.UUCP (William Swan)
Organization: Summation Inc, Woodinville WA
Lines: 13
Summary: 

In article <4265@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> trudel (Jonathan D.) writes:
>	Here in NJ, I sit wondering to myself,  why isn't there any
>sort of regional distribution other than statewide distribution?

You don't have it because nobody back there bothered to implement it.
Our distributions go: local, seattle, wa, pnw (Pacific NW), usa, etc

pnw covers Washington, Oregon, maybe British Columbia, Idaho, Montana
(*are* there any systems in Montana?). (I suppose I should find out some
day what the limits are to "pnw" :-).

-- 
William Swan  {ihnp4,decvax,allegra,...}!uw-beaver!tikal!sigma!bill