Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!harvard!bbnccv!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: 50% Reduction in Nuclear Arms
Message-ID: <7800866@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Dec-85 20:41:00 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.7800866
Posted: Tue Dec  3 20:41:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Dec-85 20:52:32 EST
References: <1270@ames.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:ames:-127000:inmet:7800866:000:335
Nf-From: inmet!janw    Dec  3 20:41:00 1985


[al at ames]
> [I cut, you choose arms reduction idea]

BRAVO !!!
What an ingenious, fresh, constructive idea !

One difficulty: what if the Soviets divide their arsenal
into a larger, but less verifiable part, and a smaller,
but more verifiable one ?

Probably this can be handled, and I am all for trying your idea.

	Jan Wasilewsky