Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!okstate.UUCP!uokvax.UUCP!cdrigney
From: cdrigney@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: US burial and armed strength:Re
Message-ID: <5000167@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Dec-85 07:32:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uokvax.5000167
Posted: Mon Dec 16 07:32:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Dec-85 19:48:37 EST
References: <836@mmintl.UUCP>
Lines: 24
Nf-ID: #R:mmintl.UUCP:836:uokvax.UUCP:5000167:000:885
Nf-From: uokvax.UUCP!cdrigney    Dec 16 06:32:00 1985


In answer to Frank Adams, Tim Sevener (orb@whuxl) writes:
 
>  I am glad that you are willing to admit that "world conquest" is not a
>  primary part of Soviet foreign policy.  Having gotten that far you then
>  say that "contol of their neighbors" is an important part of their policy.
>  I agree.  How is that *less* of a part of *any* nation's foreign policy?
>  Let us look at our own checkered history of control of countries,
>  neighbors or not.  

Gee Tim, you forgot...

The Military Invasion and Subjugation of Canada.

The Invasion of Mexico by armored units in 1968 to crush open rebellion.

The building of the notorious Toronto Wall to prevent Canadian
Citizens from escaping U.S. domination, complete with machine guns
and land mines.

		--Carl Rigney
USENET:		{ihnp4,allegra!cbosgd}!okstate!uokvax!cdrigney

Anyone who thinks this needs a :-) needs one themselves! :-)