Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-bach!mahoney
From: mahoney@bach.DEC
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Louis Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, Jerry Falwell and Reagan
Message-ID: <32@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Dec-85 15:54:02 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.32
Posted: Mon Dec 16 15:54:02 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Dec-85 19:54:44 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 25


---------------------Reply to mail dated 12-DEC-1985 06:26---------------------

>------
>To repeat, Jackson was asked to denounce Farrakhan solely because of
>Farrakhan's racist statements.  You have yet to demonstrate why
>REAGAN should denounce Falwell.
>-- 
>Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL  ihnp4!ihlpg!tan

   What do you call Mr Falwell's views on South Africa and the Bishop
Tutu?  Personally I thought they were racist and stupid.  Now do you
just call them stupid well then just for the stupidity of what he said
Reagan should disavow him.  (I don't have the quotes on me right now
but if neccesary I will go to the library and look them up).

   The group I feel the sorriest for in all this are the Fundementalists.
I have heard and talked to Fundementalist who believe that Jerry Falwell
is quite simply power hungry.  I do not think, though I have have no proof,
that the majority of the Fundementalists agree with Mr Falwell.  The Moral
Majority is not all the Fundementalists which is what most people in this
country believe. 

Brian Mahoney
"Another liberal run rampent"