Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site csd2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!seismo!cmcl2!csd2!sykora
From: sykora@csd2.UUCP (Michael Sykora)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Newsflash! [JoSH on Socialis
Message-ID: <4340005@csd2.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 7-Dec-85 22:22:00 EST
Article-I.D.: csd2.4340005
Posted: Sat Dec  7 22:22:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Dec-85 20:49:16 EST
References: <266@meccts.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 20

>/* franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) /  5:16 pm  Dec  4, 1985 */

> . . .  It is impossible to do ANYTHING
>without polluting at least a little bit.  Where do you draw the line?
>More to the point, HOW do you draw the line?  I have yet to see a
>reasonable response to any of these questions from any libertarian.

>Frank Adams                           ihpn4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka


This is not just a question for libertarians.  Every society must draw
the line somewhere between the extremes of allowing all pollution
and eliminating all pollution causing production.  It would appear that
either extreme course would yield disasterous results.

I don't have the answer to this question, but would also be interested
in listening to anyone who believes they have it, from a libertarian
perspective or otherwise.

Michael Sykora