Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!hound!rwsh From: rwsh@hound.UUCP (R.STUBBLEFIELD) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Politics and Ethics--Socialism, Libertarianism, and Capitalism Message-ID: <1547@hound.UUCP> Date: Sun, 8-Dec-85 22:48:33 EST Article-I.D.: hound.1547 Posted: Sun Dec 8 22:48:33 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 10-Dec-85 21:51:44 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 63 Politics and Ethics Political labels seem to be treated rather loosely on the net. There are people who believe that socialism promotes freedom; and there are others who think that libertarianism does. I think that such beliefs can only be held by treating those concepts as floating abstractions--i.e., by not carefully identifying the facts that give rise to the terms. Politics is a normative science. It deals with how society should be organized to achieve certain ends. The "how" is the means and might be anarchy, democracy, monarchy, a constitutional republic, or some other form. The means are important; but more important yet are the ends. Throughout history there have been only two variants--the end is the good of the collective or the end is the good of the individual. Even the social systems of absolute rulers were seen as preserving the tribe, the race, the nation, or the empire. To date only one nation has explicitly been designed to promote the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of the individual. A political system is embodied in a code of laws that define how man should act when living in a social context. Principles which guide man's actions are moral principles. Thus, a political system rests on a basis of a moral system--a code of ethics. Capitalism is a political system where the social environment supports individual ownership of the instruments of production. More broadly, capitalism is the system that protects the rights of individuals. The ethical base of capitalism is (in a loaded term) selfishness. The unit of value in a capitalist society is the individual. A capitalist government uses its monopoly on legal coercion to prohibit the initiation of force. It uses force only in retaliation against criminals, allowing its citizens to pursue their own rational self-interest free from the arbitrary use of force by others in society. Thus a capitalist society is a free society. Equivocations by some notwithstanding, the unit of value of socialism is a group--just as it is for all other forms of collectivism. The ethical base of socialism is the opposite of selfishness--i.e., self-sacrifice. There is a point in any collective political system where the individual is sacrificed for some collective good. This can be seen when the state initiates force against individuals to achieve some "public good." At some point (in fact at more and more points as time goes on) whoever decides for the state says to the individual, "In this matter you are not free to decide for yourself. Do as I command." Collectivist states are slave states. The world is full of collectivist states--especially totalitarian socialist ones; but there are no capitalist nations today. The United States has come closest but is now that unstable system known as a welfare state--part slave, part free--drifting in the direction of more sacrifice and less freedom. Some of you on the net would like to reverse our drift into slavery and have chosen to fight under the libertarian banner. Please reconsider. The concept of libertarianism allows people to pretend they are in favor of a particular political system (one that promotes liberty) without committing to any particular ethics. The libertarian umbrella shelters conservative "capitalists" who dare not speak in favor of selfishness, hippies who believe in communal living, pragmatists who believe crime can be rational for criminals, anarchists who believe that the concept of contract has meaning in the absence of government, and anyone else who proclaims to be in favor of liberty. This is the sense in which libertarianism takes liberty as an axiom. And this is the reason that libertarianism is anti-philosophical. If it is freedom you want, it is capitalism and rational egoism you have to defend. -- Bob Stubblefield ihnp4!hound!rwsh 201-949-2846