Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site teddy.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!teddy!lkk From: lkk@teddy.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Re: Experimentation and Danger Message-ID: <1860@teddy.UUCP> Date: Sat, 28-Dec-85 14:34:50 EST Article-I.D.: teddy.1860 Posted: Sat Dec 28 14:34:50 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Dec-85 07:44:47 EST References: <344@pedsgd.UUCP> <28200281@inmet.UUCP> Reply-To: lkk@teddy.UUCP (Larry K. Kolodney) Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass. Lines: 32 Summary: In article <914@mmintl.UUCP> franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams) writes: >>What Jack Kemp and others who support aiding UNITA are asking us to do >>is get the United States involved in a tribal conflict that is >>certainly none of our business. But I digress... > >Your analysis (which I deleted) is correct as far as it goes. But the >fact is that nations which are our enemies are supporting that govern- >ment, hoping to gain and cause us to lose thereby. That makes it our >business. The fact that it is a local, tribal conflict does make it >only a local, tribal conflict; the presence of Cuban soldiers makes it >something more. (Which is not to say we should intervene. Just that >there is some reason for intervention.) Since you admit there is no MORAL imperative in Angola (i.e. neither side is per se superior), you need to justify American action there by a STRATEGIC analysis. Your strategic analysis is that the presence of Cubans in Angola is some justification for American intervention. By that line of thinking, you could justify Soviet interference in Central America, Europe, and the Far East. Needless to say, the U.S. regularly expresses outrage over unsubstantiated COVERT Soviet interference in Central America. Who's pointing fingers at whom? -- Sport Death, (USENET) ...{decvax | ihnp4!mit-eddie}!genrad!panda!lkk Larry Kolodney (INTERNET) lkk@mit-mc.arpa -------- Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. - Helen Keller