Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site hpfclp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpfcdc!hpfcla!paul
From: paul@hpfcla.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.rec.ski
Subject: Re: X-C ski equipment
Message-ID: <14700017@hpfclp.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Dec-85 18:12:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hpfclp.14700017
Posted: Mon Dec 16 18:12:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Dec-85 13:21:52 EST
References: <1937@zehntel.UUCP>
Organization: 16 Dec 85 16:12:00 MST
Lines: 29


I have heard good things about the Glissade  boots from the  powderheads
in this  area.  It is really  hard to go wrong  with a Merrel  (sp?)  or
Asolo  boot.  For the type of skiing you would be doing,  the 350 sounds
like an excellent choice.

Around here, the ski of choice is the Fischer Europa 99.  It has a GREAT
wax pocket (much  better than the Karhus), and turns really well in soft
snow.  However,  it is not  very  stiff,  so it does not do well in hard
pack or crud.  I heard that  Fischer  modified it slightly  this year to
make it more of an all  around ski - that is, they made it  stiffer  and
more like the Karhus.

No feedback on the partial edges yet.  Sounds like a gimmick to me.

One of the best things you can buy are adjustable poles.  There are many
models  out now, and they are worth  every  cent you pay for.  It really
helps  having a short  pole when  trying  to  telemark,  and most of the
models can be put  together to form an  avalanche  probe or for using to
put air holes in your snow cave.

Don't get caught up in  tech-weeenie-itis.  A few solid  investments  in
boots,  skiis, poles, and clothing is all that is necessary.  Then start
backcountry  skiing with someone who can teach you all the essentials of
mountain travel, telemarking, etc.  and start enjoying the experience.


paul beiser
ft. collins, co