Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site amdahl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!amdahl!ems
From: ems@amdahl.UUCP (ems)
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Re: "Shadowing" geosync satellites
Message-ID: <2416@amdahl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Dec-85 20:01:10 EST
Article-I.D.: amdahl.2416
Posted: Fri Dec 20 20:01:10 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Dec-85 01:32:33 EST
References: <441@brl-tgr.ARPA> <456@ihlpl.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Circle C Shellfish Ranch, Shores-of-the-Pacific, Ca
Lines: 10

> If a space station is  NOT in geosync orbit, I think that a larger
> problem would come when it entered Soviet airspace.

Uh, the biggest problem from a space station entering Soviet
*AIR*space would be the fireball ...

-- 
E. Michael Smith  ...!{hplabs,ihnp4,amd,nsc}!amdahl!ems

This is the obligatory disclaimer of everything.