Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ISM780B.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!ucla-cs!ucbvax!decvax!ISM780B!jimb
From: jimb@ISM780B.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.sport.baseball
Subject: Explain Trillo to Cubs, please
Message-ID: <28000007@ISM780B.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 12-Dec-85 11:05:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ISM780B.28000007
Posted: Thu Dec 12 11:05:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Dec-85 23:31:28 EST
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #N:ISM780B:28000007:000:556
Nf-From: ISM780B!jimb    Dec 12 11:05:00 1985


[...and it's a deep fly ball to Line-Eater...]

Can someone who's read the Chicago papers tell me what the Cubs view of the
Trillo trade is?   Is Trillo:

a).  Simply a back-up infielder, along with Speier

b).  Play second-base, moving Sandberg back to third...

     1). ...and Cey's contract get's eaten

     2). ...and Cey is an extraordinarily high-paid sub/pinch-hitter

     3). ...and Cey is bought out of his no-trade clause and dealt
            to the American League as a DH>

c.)  Shifted to third base, with variations noted in b.) above.

Thanks.