Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 SMI; site sun.uucp
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!chuq
From: chuq@sun.uucp (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: net.text
Subject: Re: WYSIWYG
Message-ID: <3103@sun.uucp>
Date: Wed, 1-Jan-86 01:57:09 EST
Article-I.D.: sun.3103
Posted: Wed Jan  1 01:57:09 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 2-Jan-86 04:42:45 EST
References: <2592@glacier.ARPA> <11287@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <990@mako.UUCP> <2643@glacier.ARPA> <992@mako.UUCP>
Organization: Sun Micro -- NFS Consulting Group
Lines: 24

> >>Take, for instance, Richard Stallman's GNU emacs.  It is best known as a
> >>WYSIWYG text editor, however, it also has a text-manipulation language...
> >
> >Emacs is not a WYSIWYG editor. It is a display editor...
> 
> Semantics, semantics!

Ah, but without disagreements on semantics we have no reason to argue. It is a
LOT more fun arguing about semantics than about the topic itself... *grin!*

> Emacs is a WYSIWYG /text editor\ as opposed to a /text
> formatter\.

Uh, I've never SEEN a \text editor/ that wasn't WYSIWYG if you take brian's
argument. I don't think that emacs is WYSIWYG at all, unless you consider a
typewriter or an 80x24 screen appropriate final copy. It is a visual screen
editor, nothing more or less than ed with delusions of grandeur. (again,
semantics...)

-- 
:From catacombs of Castle Tarot:        Chuq Von Rospach 
sun!chuq@decwrl.DEC.COM                 {hplabs,ihnp4,nsc,pyramid}!sun!chuq

It's not looking, it's heat seeking.