Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 / ST 1.0; site saber.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!nsc!saber!msc
From: msc@saber.UUCP (Mark Callow)
Newsgroups: net.video
Subject: Re: VHS copying
Message-ID: <1897@saber.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 2-Jan-86 19:24:59 EST
Article-I.D.: saber.1897
Posted: Thu Jan  2 19:24:59 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jan-86 06:25:23 EST
References: <931@ihlpa.UUCP> <8000001@hpfcdj.UUCP> <453@nrcvax.UUCP>
Organization: Saber Technology, San Jose, CA
Lines: 23

> In article <8000001@hpfcdj.UUCP> dgrif@hpfcla.UUCP writes:
> >small flame on
> >
> > Why is it that when someone mentions copying VHS tapes someone else
> >jumps to the conclusion that copyright material is being duplicated?
> > ...
> >etc. Lighten up and help the guy with what probably is a legitimate request.
> >
> >flame off.
> >
> I think the point here was that if there is a copy-guard, it implies
> a copyright.
>--
> Andre' Hut

The point, as dgrif said, is to "lighten up."  The original poster said
nothing about copyguard.  He asked only about video enhancers.  Someone else
jumped to conclusions.  (And I always thought a person was innocent until
proven guilty.)
-- 
From the TARDIS of Mark Callow
msc@saber.uucp,  sun!saber!msc@decwrl.dec.com ...{ihnp4,sun}!saber!msc
"Boards are long and hard and made of wood"