Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ubc-vision.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsri!ubc-vision!mokhtar
From: mokhtar@ubc-vision.UUCP (Farzin Mokhtarian)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Safe Sex
Message-ID: <28@ubc-vision.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Dec-85 22:42:44 EST
Article-I.D.: ubc-visi.28
Posted: Mon Dec 23 22:42:44 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Dec-85 00:59:12 EST
Organization: UBC Computational Vision Lab, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Lines: 19

> What do you want to do, people,  give all those idiot men out there
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> the impression that the major preoccupation of women as a group is 
> sex?  Don't we have anything more intelligent to discuss?
>
> Cheryl Stewart            Systems Development    lasspvax!cheryl@cornell.arpa
        
This question is completely wrong as posed. It should read something like:
   
"Are we capable of discussing sex in an intelligent way?"
  
But then some "idiot men" might get the idea that you as a woman actually
spend some time thinking about sex. The smarter ones already know that.
   
    Farzin Mokhtarian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A blessing, we should use it, should we not?
 And if a Curse - why, then, Who set it there?