Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dciem.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!reid
From: reid@dciem.UUCP (David Brake c/o Reid Ellis)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Unions, CRDs...
Message-ID: <1777@dciem.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-Jan-86 16:30:04 EST
Article-I.D.: dciem.1777
Posted: Tue Jan 21 16:30:04 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Jan-86 20:08:41 EST
References: <137@ubc-cs.UUCP> <756@watmath.UUCP> <139@ubc-cs.UUCP> <682@mprvaxa.UUCP> <146@ubc-cs.UUCP> <2252@hcrvx2.UUCP>
Reply-To: reid@dciem.UUCP (David Brake c/o Reid Ellis)
Distribution: can
Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada
Lines: 21


Mr. Robinson:
I am afraid that your argument about the proposed flexibility
of unions, attractive as it may seem in theory, could
not work in practice. If a worker did not pay for union
membership, it would be practically impossible to prevent
him from gaining because of their activities. A company
simply cannot afford the time to negociate different wage
rates on an individual basis. As a result, when the union,
representing a large proportion of the workers in a company,
arrives at a contract, chances are that the results of the
contract would be applied to the whole company, not just to
the union members.

David Russell Brake I, Esq.
Scholar and Gentleman
-- 
--
Reid Ellis	"It *is* Space Invaders!!"
{{allegra,decvax,duke,floyd,linus}!utzoo,{ihnp4,utzoo}!utcsri}!dciem!reid
This message brought to you courtesy of the Poslfit Committee