Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2d.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2d!osd From: osd@hou2d.UUCP (Orlando Sotomayor-Diaz) Newsgroups: mod.std.c Subject: mod.std.c Digest V13#3 Message-ID: <857@hou2d.UUCP> Date: Tue, 21-Jan-86 08:24:51 EST Article-I.D.: hou2d.857 Posted: Tue Jan 21 08:24:51 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Jan-86 02:15:35 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 46 Approved: osd@hou2d.UUCP From: Orlando Sotomayor-Diaz (The Moderator) mod.std.c Digest Tue, 21 Jan 86 Volume 13 : Issue 3 Today's Topics: Near and far pointers Remainder on floats ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 86 00:55 EST From: Paul Schauble Subject: Near and far pointers To: cbosgd!std-c The current version of Microsoft C has an extension to the language that allows one to declare individual pointers as long or short. (This probably only makes sense if you program the Intel 8086.) I understand that they have proposed this extension for the C standard. Can someone tell me if this is true, and, if so, does it look like it will be accepted?? Thanks, Paul ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 21 Jan 86 01:47:46 PST From: hoptoad!gnu (John Gilmore) Subject: Remainder on floats To: I was surprised to discover that the C language does not define the remainder operation (%) on floats. It's certainly clear that this is useful (ever do argument reduction for transcendentals?) and there are good definitions of it, e.g. in the IEEE float spec. Is this just a historical problem (e.g. the PDP-11 didn't have the instruction so it's not in C) and is this likely to get fixed by the standard? ------------------------------ End of mod.std.c Digest - Tue, 21 Jan 86 08:23:31 EST ****************************** USENET -> posting only through cbosgd!std-c. ARPA -> ... through cbosgd!std-c@BERKELEY.ARPA (NOT to INFO-C) In all cases, you may also reply to the author(s) above.