Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site oddjob.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!petrus!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!oddjob!apak
From: apak@oddjob.UUCP (Adrian Kent)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Arguments against murder
Message-ID: <1106@oddjob.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Jan-86 00:33:17 EST
Article-I.D.: oddjob.1106
Posted: Wed Jan  8 00:33:17 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Jan-86 02:41:12 EST
References: <1100@oddjob.UUCP> <1730@druxu.UUCP> <1101@oddjob.UUCP> <325@milano.UUCP>
Reply-To: apak@oddjob.UUCP (Adrian Kent)
Distribution: na
Organization: U. Chicago, Astronomy & Astrophysics
Lines: 9
Summary: 

In article <325@milano.UUCP> wex@milano.UUCP writes:
>In article <1101@oddjob.UUCP>, apak@oddjob.UUCP (Adrian Kent) tries to present
>some of his reasoning (not religiously-based) as to why one ought not to
>murder adult human beings.  This is something which is quite difficult to do,
>and Adrian makes several mistakes.  Lines beginning with > are from Adrian.

      I disagree with the ensuing analysis. Anyone who's interested can find
the reasons in net.philosophy.
                              ak