Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site birtch.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!felix!birtch!oleg
From: oleg@birtch.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Arguments against murder
Message-ID: <246@birtch.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 7-Jan-86 16:47:56 EST
Article-I.D.: birtch.246
Posted: Tue Jan  7 16:47:56 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 10-Jan-86 00:29:12 EST
References: <1100@oddjob.UUCP> <1730@druxu.UUCP> <1101@oddjob.UUCP> <325@milano.UUCP>
Reply-To: oleg@birtch.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev)
Distribution: na
Organization: The Real Estate Conspiracy
Lines: 20

In article <325@milano.UUCP> wex@milano.UUCP writes:
>Let me give just one example, from real life, indicating some
>of the problems:  In Jamaica, there are Rastafarians who use ganja in their
>religion and in their everyday lives.  They believe that it increases their
>abilities, intellect, etc.  They tried quite hard to convice me that I was
>somehow incomplete because I didn't want to smoke it.  Now, if they held to the
>principle above, they would believe that it was moral for them to force me to
>smoke it.  Adrian can use his principle only because the large majority of his
>readers have very similar ideas of what is `the good.'

*IF* they forced you! PRO-LIFE movement is in favor of FORCIN women NOT to have
abortins. Pro-choice argument is that women should have a choice. You argument
is invalid. Only if PRO-CHOICE side were to FORCE MANDATORY abortions on ALL
women, would your example be of any merit. 
-- 
Disclamer: I don't work here anymore - so they are not responsible for me.
+-------------------------------+ Don't bother, I'll find the door!
|   STAY ALERT! TRUST NO ONE!   |                       Oleg Kiselev. 
|     KEEP YOUR LASER HANDY!    |...!{trwrb|scgvaxd}!felix!birtch!oleg
--------------------------------+...!{ihnp4|randvax}!ucla-cs!uclapic!oac6!oleg